> On March 28, 2016, 5:06 p.m., Cong Wang wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/subprocess.hpp, line 311
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/45230/diff/2/?file=1316622#file1316622line311>
> >
> >     This one breaks build even after all of your 7 patches are committed, 
> > because port_mapping.cpp passes flags but no setsid to subprocess(), this 
> > is not allowed by C++.
> 
> Joerg Schad wrote:
>     Thx for catching: Fixed with https://reviews.apache.org/r/45400/

Actually: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45399/


- Joerg


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45230/#review125677
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 28, 2016, 4:51 p.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45230/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 28, 2016, 4:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Joris Van Remoortere.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5049
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5049
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Executing arbitrary setup functions while creating new processes is
> dangerous as all functions called have to be async safe. As setup
> functions are used for only very few purposes (setsid, chdir, monitoring
> and killing a process (see upcoming review) it makes sense to support
> them safely via parameters to subprocess. Note this review by itself
> -without the following ones- removing the uses of the old interface will
> break the build.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/ssl/gtest.hpp 
> 2ca705524c8f9bba3c03eef296dc04a353dd236c 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/subprocess.hpp 
> e0c306aa5cf5f393abb73768bbd287c45730f076 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/subprocess.cpp 
> b99bad04f7251169df3bfcec5dee459977440997 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45230/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> tested entire chain (see https://reviews.apache.org/r/45236/).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joerg Schad
> 
>

Reply via email to