> On April 22, 2016, 1:22 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > src/slave/slave.hpp, lines 471-472
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46319/diff/2/?file=1348482#file1348482line471>
> >
> >     How did this come up? The original `_statistics()` is not static, and 
> > it had no issues.
> 
> Benjamin Bannier wrote:
>     The original `statistics` did not make any use of member data in any of 
> the `defer`ed actions (all the used data came from some 
> `Future<ResourceUsage>` directly passed into the callback; the call of 
> `slave->self()` was not executed in the `defer`ed action). Now here we need 
> to access a rate limiter which is a member of `Http` which in turn might go 
> away before `_statistics` is executed.

And now that `_statistics()` is synchronous and no longer uses the limiter, do 
we still need to worry about this?


- Adam


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46319/#review130057
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 25, 2016, 7:16 a.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46319/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 25, 2016, 7:16 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Alexander Rojas, and Jan Schlicht.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5164
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5164
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added authorization to agents' `/monitor/statistics` endpoints.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/http.cpp 537736d1fe42e8150bad91326299ef9a17041a8e 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 20a4bcd0bb9dad06ea81fc4ad9b2fa462c69d2c5 
>   src/tests/slave_authorization_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46319/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (OS X, clang w/o optimization)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to