-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46757/#review130972
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/messages/messages.proto (line 304)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/46757/#comment194879>

    ditto. needs to mention that this is only send to v1 schedulers.



src/tests/mesos.hpp (line 961)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/46757/#comment194880>

    camel case?


- Vinod Kone


On April 28, 2016, 1:21 a.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46757/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 28, 2016, 1:21 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, Joseph Wu, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5296
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5296
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> V1 API: Split Rescind for offers and Inverse Offers.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/scheduler/scheduler.proto 
> 078c6550f24a3d8ac675251168434130fc3eeef3 
>   include/mesos/v1/scheduler/scheduler.proto 
> 8ed9e19a9e5aa19a518b708b0e0d9cfdc038cd11 
>   src/cli/execute.cpp 370e9f4924514077bb816c537261b9070658ddfb 
>   src/examples/long_lived_framework.cpp 
> 4c9ba5fea2cc1eafa8ee942a505038c9b109ff65 
>   src/examples/test_http_framework.cpp 
> db0463d894e9f2fb964781d16f8c622ce8a507a5 
>   src/internal/evolve.hpp cff6b657a6d69ff9e7f7dedc965122a03a200da1 
>   src/internal/evolve.cpp 4ca2abacd75523de8fb4ffe69a9edd8627f512af 
>   src/master/master.cpp ff41da3d077b65b44277e1bbae88c61b7bb88a3d 
>   src/messages/messages.proto e0f1fca92d3ea8c29c095da31653c317873a934c 
>   src/sched/sched.cpp a1ec280222689a05e9a0241ec5c84277a25b0866 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp 0f6f541c5d2007a69ad5bd6e884235cd3c0c1be2 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46757/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere
> 
>

Reply via email to