> On April 29, 2016, 10:02 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote: > > docs/maintenance.md, lines 269-273 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46779/diff/1/?file=1364760#file1364760line269> > > > > I would put this paragraph in a `>NOTE:`
Personally I'd opt to keep this as-is: other paragraphs in the same section (e.g., Draining -> Deactivated transition) are similarly parenthetical comments, but I don't think we need to make one paragraph more prominent than another. - Neil ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46779/#review131187 ----------------------------------------------------------- On April 28, 2016, 2:53 p.m., Neil Conway wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/46779/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 28, 2016, 2:53 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Jie Yu. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Clarified and improved maintenance docs. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/maintenance.md 1f2b14fcbe86b0a2dc1ad59ce1b17d9d07409930 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46779/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Neil Conway > >
