> On April 29, 2016, 10:02 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> > docs/maintenance.md, lines 269-273
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46779/diff/1/?file=1364760#file1364760line269>
> >
> >     I would put this paragraph in a `>NOTE:`

Personally I'd opt to keep this as-is: other paragraphs in the same section 
(e.g., Draining -> Deactivated transition) are similarly parenthetical 
comments, but I don't think we need to make one paragraph more prominent than 
another.


- Neil


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46779/#review131187
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 28, 2016, 2:53 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46779/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 28, 2016, 2:53 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Clarified and improved maintenance docs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/maintenance.md 1f2b14fcbe86b0a2dc1ad59ce1b17d9d07409930 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46779/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to