> On Maj 11, 2016, 12:21 rano, Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/tests/log_tests.cpp, lines 450-452
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47161/diff/4/?file=1378321#file1378321line450>
> >
> >     How about this comment for clarity?
> >     ```
> >       // By design only a single process can access leveldb at a time. In
> >       // this test, two instances of log replica need to open a connection
> >       // to the leveldb. By introducing scope levels we ensure that the 
> > first
> >       // instance is destructed and hence closes the connection before the
> >       // second instance opens it.
> >     ```

Thanks


- Tomasz


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47161/#review132572
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Maj 10, 2016, 5:50 po południu, Tomasz Janiszewski wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/47161/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Maj 10, 2016, 5:50 po południu)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Kapil Arya.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2201
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2201
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Per design leveldb can only be held open by a single process
> at the time. In tests two instances of replica log were created
> and lived at same time. Now there is one instance that create
> db and second that restore it.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/log_tests.cpp 4cd6bc359d481c065d9647b3d5f0154cb5cb2503 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47161/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested with leveldb v1.18 before this patch tests failed with ` error: lock 
> already held by process` after this patch all tests passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tomasz Janiszewski
> 
>

Reply via email to