> On May 22, 2016, 10:58 p.m., Michael Park wrote: > > include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.hpp, line 51 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47558/diff/6/?file=1390615#file1390615line51> > > > > I'm leaning towards calling this `ObjectAuthorizer`. We would > > effectively have `authorized(subject, action, object)` and > > `object_authorizer = authorized(subject, action); > > object_authorizer.authorized(object);`. What do you think?
As mentioned earlier: The goal here was to differentiate between the asynchronous `authorized()` call and the synchronous `allow` call. If you feel that is not needed, I will happily change this. - Joerg ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47558/#review134295 ----------------------------------------------------------- On May 22, 2016, 9:25 p.m., Joerg Schad wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/47558/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 22, 2016, 9:25 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Michael Park and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-5403 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5403 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added allower interface to authorizer. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.hpp > ed5f9e73661e25a83722cf1e408ae61023cd4a21 > src/authorizer/local/authorizer.hpp > 61388454025211fd7d53e71a86983fd8479950b6 > src/authorizer/local/authorizer.cpp > dc53bc4374aea98b5ed41ade5617374d2447229b > src/tests/mesos.hpp 79bf1ff16412ce2a510a9b75ab1ac91c1c182653 > src/tests/mesos.cpp 629135f0dc59346f0fcddb2cbe65ca5770fad34e > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47558/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > tested entire chain. > > > Thanks, > > Joerg Schad > >
