-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51015/#review145660
-----------------------------------------------------------




3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/ssl/flags.hpp (lines 13 - 14)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51015/#comment211990>

    This should be: `__PROCESS_SSL_FLAGS_HPP__`



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/ssl/flags.hpp (line 16)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51015/#comment211991>

    Why are the contents of this file ifdef'd out here?  Shouldn't the 
ifdef-ing be done by the includer?


- Joseph Wu


On Aug. 12, 2016, 2:11 p.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51015/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 12, 2016, 2:11 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Joris Van Remoortere and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> For allowing modules to identify the current SSL specific setup of
> their hosting process (master, agent, ...), the libprocess SSL flags
> are now being publically exposed.
> The newly added flags.hpp is guarded by a `USE_SSL_SOCKET` define
> check.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/Makefile.am 
> a27e9f7aaa2b45139d4eb95f365d8b2041d7aad2 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/ssl/flags.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/openssl.hpp 
> f33614c82cefbf1c74a74ba9b3fa02105d0bec5b 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/openssl.cpp 
> a73313b3221d6c80b35f21c00f35d9f9c795f1ec 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51015/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check on final RR.
> 
> NOTE: No functional changes involved.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Till Toenshoff
> 
>

Reply via email to