> On July 28, 2016, 12:01 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/cgroups.cpp, line 486
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/49827/diff/9/?file=1453251#file1453251line486>
> >
> >     Would love to understand why test will cause this issue.
> 
> Qian Zhang wrote:
>     It seems that comment was introduced by this ticket: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1438 , and in the test code here: 
> https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/1.0.0/src/tests/cluster.cpp#L552:L559 , 
> I see each container created in the test will be cleaned up, and we have 
> already initiated cleanup for those containers in the test code, that might 
> be where the race occurs.
> 
> haosdent huang wrote:
>     Thx @qian!

Calling `destroy` on Containerizer multiple times should not cause 
`isolator->destroy` being called multiple times. I still don't get it


- Jie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49827/#review143861
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 31, 2016, 5:47 p.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/49827/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 31, 2016, 5:47 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Jie Yu, Qian Zhang, and Zhengju Sha.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5041
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5041
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Implemented `CgroupsIsolatorProcess::cleanup`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/cgroups.hpp 
> 422b4653fc3cb3d14c94b93ff456625fc59fbb27 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/cgroups.cpp 
> bd20631a9650cf84e99c6489b2e92bc40ed764ca 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49827/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>

Reply via email to