> On Sept. 22, 2016, 1:47 a.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> > Looks sane :)

Thanks for reviewing!


> On Sept. 22, 2016, 1:47 a.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> > 3rdparty/stout/tests/os_tests.cpp, line 695
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/52048/diff/1/?file=1502864#file1502864line695>
> >
> >     We don't actually include `std::sort` in the headers, so this shouldn't 
> > be able to compile...
> >     
> >     Either way, you should fully qualify this function.

Agree it should be fully qualified. However, last diff didn't fail to compile - 
I suspect a header file with "using namespace std" is included by accident.


- Mao


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52048/#review149936
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 22, 2016, 7:29 a.m., Mao Geng wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/52048/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 22, 2016, 7:29 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Kapil Arya, and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5909
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5909
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fixed OsTest.User test failure due to gids ordering.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/tests/os_tests.cpp c2900b8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52048/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Just changed the OsTest.User test. `make check` passed on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mao Geng
> 
>

Reply via email to