> On Nov. 22, 2016, 8:34 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> > docs/health-checks.md, line 19
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53610/diff/2/?file=1567486#file1567486line19>
> >
> >     The phrase "incorporating network failures in health check information 
> > is not always desirable" is vague. What is the specific concern here?

The concern is that the task may be perfectly fine, but the network connection 
between the scheduler and the task is currently flaky, resulting in health 
check failures.

How about this: "moreover, network failures between the task and the scheduler 
may make the latter think that the former is unhealthy, which might not be the 
case."


> On Nov. 22, 2016, 8:34 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> > docs/health-checks.md, line 21
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53610/diff/2/?file=1567486#file1567486line21>
> >
> >     Isn't a major advantage of Mesos-native health checks is that you avoid 
> > the scalability problems of having a single scheduler handle the health 
> > checks for a potentially large number of tasks?

I though that's exactly what this sentence says : )


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53610/#review156617
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 20, 2016, 6:52 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53610/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 20, 2016, 6:52 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gastón Kleiman, haosdent huang, Neil Conway, and 
> Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5597
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5597
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/health-checks.md PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/home.md a5811480de050352dca6c0f7e4e64d3d2351c2d5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53610/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> https://gist.github.com/rukletsov/7200c36b2fd1e81f78f2583e68b31fd1
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to