-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54215/#review157484
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/store.cpp (line 263)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54215/#comment228086>

    I took a quick look at `mesosphere/inky` and all repeating layers are 
empty, so this is fine for this case.
    
    However, I'm not sure whether there is a legitemate case which same 
non-empty layer can repeat in the same images multiple times. If that's 
possible then this code could break such image provisioning (unfortunately I 
can't reproduce such a case myself...)


- Zhitao Li


On Nov. 30, 2016, 6:54 p.m., Gilbert Song wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54215/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 30, 2016, 6:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Artem Harutyunyan, Jie Yu, Qian Zhang, and Zhitao 
> Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6654
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6654
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This issue is exposed by pulling the 'mesosphere/inky' docker
> image using registry puller. Due to the duplicate layer id
> from the manifest, there are duplicate layer pathes passed
> to the backend. The aufs backend cannot handle this case and
> returns 'invalid arguments' error. Ideally, we should make
> sure that layer paths that are passed to the backend are
> unique.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/store.cpp 
> 9dccd0673dbc0c61abfd4b88097f86e7d7131c46 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54215/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> Tested by the unit test 
> `ROOT_CURL_INTERNET_DockerDefaultEntryptRegistryPuller`.
> 
> Manually tested using the `mesosphere/inky` image, which contains duplicate 
> layer ids.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gilbert Song
> 
>

Reply via email to