> On Dec. 3, 2016, 6:57 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/tests/api_tests.cpp, line 3828
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/54337/diff/1/?file=1575125#file1575125line3828>
> >
> >     hmm. InternalServerError instead of a BadRequest sounds wrong.
> >     
> >     for non-streaming requests, looks like validation error results in 
> > BadRequest(); but not so for streaming requests?

Yep, this is as per the description of the commit:
"This also raises the question if we should perform this validation in the 
handler itself for streaming requests."

I was already working on the issue (should have been more clearer). Fixed with: 
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54342


- Anand


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54337/#review157897
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 3, 2016, 7:19 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54337/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 3, 2016, 7:19 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Previously, we were validating that all records on the stream
> should have 'attach_container_input.container_id' set. However,
> only the first record should have it set and be of type
> 'AttachContainerInput::CONTAINER_ID'.
> 
> This also raises the question if we should perform this 
> validation in the handler itself for streaming requests.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/http.cpp 8b104ce9ca6e72a1e76943f0d68a0541a45e39f6 
>   src/slave/validation.cpp 15330ad6e63cf6adbdf36a3c1d1a60d2315ae511 
>   src/tests/api_tests.cpp afae6a7e0809174f48f280f170fad9315e80a906 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54337/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check + added test
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anand Mazumdar
> 
>

Reply via email to