> On Sept. 29, 2016, 3:06 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> > src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp, lines 3007-3011
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51028/diff/4/?file=1513695#file1513695line3007>
> >
> >     Just a question here, can we always guarantee only one `allocate()` 
> > will be called? I think that this depends on the speed of dispatching the 
> > `run` request.

Right, I took a look at this. I believe pausing the clock between the addSlave 
and addFramework messages is correct, this does depend on speed.


- Jacob


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51028/#review150798
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 21, 2016, 5:58 a.m., Jacob Janco wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51028/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 21, 2016, 5:58 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3157
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3157
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - Per MESOS-3157, if cluster events with the possibility
>   of triggering an allocation occur rapidly and test
>   assertions depend on gleaning information from assumed
>   order, it is likely they will fail due to lack of parity
>   between event and actual allocation. Ensure that expected
>   allocations occur.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp 
> 1edd0ecc8a93cd41532e1cf3641f67c780ab23a5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51028/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jacob Janco
> 
>

Reply via email to