> On Jan. 11, 2017, 2:19 a.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp, line 1046
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/55024/diff/1/?file=1591723#file1591723line1046>
> >
> >     s/teard down/teardown/
> >     
> >     `process::finalize` should probably perform the socket teardown, or at 
> > least give the option to do so.  
> >     
> >     Currently, very few of our processes call `process::finalize`.  They 
> > usually just rely on the OS cleaning up after them.

I'm pretty comfortable allowing `process::finalize` to clean up after itself, 
especially resources that it owns and abstracts away, but disposing of 
something that libprocess _doesn't_ own, and especially something as global and 
critical as the socket stack, seems a bit out of scope.

I do think it's prudent to entertain proposals about having it _optionally_ 
dispose of the socket stack, but I can't think of an obviously good way to do 
this. A default parameter in `process::finalize` would only be meaningful 
semantically on Windows, no?


> On Jan. 11, 2017, 2:19 a.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp, lines 1040-1041
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/55024/diff/1/?file=1591723#file1591723line1040>
> >
> >     Even if this is idempotent, we can remove the call from some of our own 
> > binaries now.
> >     
> >     Also, what is the version check you mention here?

I'll clarify the comment. What I was saying is that `wsa_initialize` will turn 
on the socket stack (which may be only on, which is fine because it's 
idempotent), but also check that its version is compatible with Stout and 
libprocess.


- Alex


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55024/#review161171
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 24, 2016, 10:46 a.m., Alex Clemmer wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55024/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 24, 2016, 10:46 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrew Schwartzmeyer, Daniel Pravat, John Kordich, 
> and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Currently libprocess will attempt to use sockets without initializing
> the socket stack on Windows. This commit will resolving this problem by
> causing `process::initialize` to initialize the socket stack.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 
> 889a03444eaee7b5ad2be65bb414c30062d4a4f0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55024/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex Clemmer
> 
>

Reply via email to