> On Feb. 11, 2017, 12:16 a.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > src/tests/master_tests.cpp, line 2032
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56375/diff/2/?file=1626156#file1626156line2032>
> >
> >     This is a little hard to figure out, can you document their allocations 
> > to describe how we know that fair sharing will make these offers to 
> > different roles? Also, it seems to me we don't know which of the two roles 
> > will get the initial offer?
> 
> Jay Guo wrote:
>     We could test combined offer as long as we can assert that 2nd and 3rd 
> offers are made to different roles, even though the role of 1st offer is not 
> deterministic, no?

Yes that's what I imagine we want here, the part that seems unclear is how 
we're guaranteeing that 2nd and 3rd offers are made to different roles. I would 
just suggest that we document for posterity how we set up the test to ensure 
this holds.


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56375/#review165041
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 13, 2017, 7:17 a.m., Jay Guo wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56375/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 13, 2017, 7:17 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Benjamin Mahler, and Guangya Liu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6637
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6637
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Multi-role framework cannot combine offers allocated to different
> roles of that framework in a single launchTask call.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp 9a7a953adbbbed0b37082bb0166d03b1388c80ae 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56375/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added a test
> make check GTEST_FILTER="MasterTest.LaunchDifferentRoleLost"
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jay Guo
> 
>

Reply via email to