-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/#review168408
-----------------------------------------------------------



hmm. for some reason i don't get the publish link when i try to add my comment 
as a reply to the issue! probably an RB bug.

posting it here:

1) Add a TODO referring to the JIRA ticket on top of the block that sets 
`healthy` field.  
For posterity to avoid confusing future devs that come across this.


2) Can we actually add a `protobuf::createTaskStatus` overload in protobuf 
utils that creates a task status from scratch 
and have `protobuf::createStatusUpdate` and the `executor::createTaskStatus` 
call that?

3) It isn’t intuitive to me why callers were setting `healthy` as an arg while 
calling `executor::createTaskStatus` whereas `check_status` was not being 
controlled by the callers? Maybe refactor so callers are responsible or add a 
TODO/comment.

4) I think using `unacknowledgeTask` in this helper (whether you move it to 
callers after the refactor) is buggy because that will be reset to `None` as 
soon as the first ack for the first update is received you should be storing 
`TaskInfo` separately irrespective of unacknowledged state maybe do a `struct 
TaskData { TaskInfo taskinfo; bool acknowledged;}`

- Vinod Kone


On March 7, 2017, 8:39 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 7, 2017, 8:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gastón Kleiman and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6906
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6906
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/executor.cpp adcc50fb7df91b9f8dff0f583b61e0efcd6da378 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/56213/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to