-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/#review165550
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/launcher/executor.cpp (lines 848 - 854)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/#comment237416>

    This method is called to build updates when the task transitions to 
`TASK_KILLING`, `TASK_FINISHED`, `TASK_KILLED`, and `TASK_FAILED`.
    
    Do we want to lose the result of the previous check in all those cases? I 
think it might make sense to keep it at least for `TASK_KILLING`. It would also 
make sense to keep the `health` flag in that case.


- Gastón Kleiman


On Feb. 8, 2017, 4:56 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 8, 2017, 4:56 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gastón Kleiman and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6906
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6906
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/executor.cpp d9417ce1d5b108f5292a66010eab80f11552a969 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/56218/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to