> On May 8, 2017, 4:59 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/common/type_utils.cpp
> > Lines 372-377 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58949/diff/2/?file=1710389#file1710389line372>
> >
> >     Let's don't introduce this yet until it's actually being used. For that 
> > reason, we don't have that for AgentInfo in v1.

I believe we should add this particular operator just for symmetry. 
`operator==` will immediately be useful to the first users.


> On May 8, 2017, 4:59 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/v1/mesos.cpp
> > Lines 374-379 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58949/diff/2/?file=1710390#file1710390line374>
> >
> >     Ditto. Remove

Ditto. See above.


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58949/#review174168
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 8, 2017, 4:49 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58949/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 8, 2017, 4:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Jan Schlicht.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7388
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7388
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Introduced ResourceProviderInfo proto.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 1935f47a52840f6b395ecb2d28296666551fa691 
>   include/mesos/type_utils.hpp 4f0a59cf7bc4172eb98db01cf73bf285c931b4d0 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.hpp e665ce7046eb6e9c4f0e896e4f8cf9e976c40454 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto c7f0bec5c96f2f41344d4261d0696f9fe0421db7 
>   src/common/type_utils.cpp 6bfb558d9f7dcdf921acdf737515a25c3a0bdaa0 
>   src/v1/mesos.cpp babe39e0e29ae7ff35360d9dfdabf771fdc940ea 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58949/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check` (Fedora25, clang-5)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to