-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60497/#review179175
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [60497, 60414, 60413, 60412, 60411, 60410, 60409]
Failed command: python support/apply-reviews.py -n -r 60409
Error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "support/apply-reviews.py", line 417, in <module>
main()
File "support/apply-reviews.py", line 412, in main
reviewboard(options)
File "support/apply-reviews.py", line 402, in reviewboard
apply_review(options)
File "support/apply-reviews.py", line 158, in apply_review
fetch_patch(options)
File "support/apply-reviews.py", line 194, in fetch_patch
patch.write(patch.read())
IOError: File not open for reading
Full log: http://mesos-winbot.westus.cloudapp.azure.com/logs/124/console
- Mesos Reviewbot Windows
On June 28, 2017, 7:54 a.m., James Peach wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60497/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated June 28, 2017, 7:54 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
>
>
> Bugs: MESOS-7671
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7671
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Update mesos-execute capabilities options to match the
> framework capabilities fields. Rename `--capabilities`
> to `--effective_capabilities`, and add a new
> `--bounding_capabilities` option.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/cli/execute.cpp 6e153446efe63700606ff33df1fb681438673084
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60497/diff/1/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> make check (Fedora 26)
> light manual testing
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> James Peach
>
>
