-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60500/#review180728
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/messages/flags.proto
Lines 56 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60500/#comment255947>

    I see Jie's point. From a framework's standpoint a name is a single domain 
of IP connectivity, so ideally if we have a network name that is both a CNI and 
CNM network (DC/OS overlay or Calico comes to mind here), it implies that it 
should be a single network and hence having a common DNS configuration across 
CNI/CNM is not incorrect. 
    
    That said instead of using Mesos and Docker as the fields if we use CNI and 
CNM as the field names would that make sense? We would then be pegging against 
the standard rather than the `Containerizer`? The reason I am proposing to keep 
two different fields here is primarily to take into consideration any 
incosistencies that might pop up in these standards at some point (right now 
there don't seem to be any for DNS).


- Avinash sridharan


On July 5, 2017, 7:03 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60500/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 5, 2017, 7:03 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Avinash sridharan and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7709
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7709
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Introduced `--default_container_dns` agent flag.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/configuration.md 007d0f556375f331148c9ad09be8b301ab31a01c 
>   src/messages/flags.hpp 70ad58c33067a0b058deafdcc4ffc5f554b6ca72 
>   src/messages/flags.proto e87075f19714739b93d9f4aa33ea8686a1bb5613 
>   src/slave/flags.hpp c6803eb54e09a5497755e1e5fef2872193eacba6 
>   src/slave/flags.cpp 398768656b5fa3b7c85474de2b4b008bf7b85cb3 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60500/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to