-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62286/#review186084
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/log/recover.cpp
Lines 652 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62286/#comment262513>

    Putting this in `recover.cpp|hpp` is very wierd. I am leaning towards 
moving this too `catchup.hpp|cpp` and just overload `catchup` method (without 
positions).



src/log/recover.cpp
Lines 701 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62286/#comment262510>

    Any reason not returnning a failure in this case?



src/log/recover.cpp
Lines 711 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62286/#comment262512>

    Can you add a few comments on this. THis is a bit hacky because we can 
essentially hijacting the recovery protocol. Ideally, we probably should split 
the recovery into several phases and uses on the phase that's relevant to this.



src/log/recover.cpp
Lines 730 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62286/#comment262511>

    Can you explain why we need to recover the same `begin` after a restart?


- Jie Yu


On Sept. 13, 2017, 4:40 p.m., Ilya Pronin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/62286/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 13, 2017, 4:40 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7973
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7973
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The process is used to "recover" a non-leading VOTING replica by running
> the recovery protocol to find current begin and end positions of the log
> and catching-up positions that are missing on the replica. This allows
> following replicas to serve eventually consistent reads.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/log/recover.hpp 94d6bb283ea82df607fcc72de05cda3b12ad5d2d 
>   src/log/recover.cpp b366818767adb259ee6805f9978fd330b790a264 
>   src/tests/log_tests.cpp f9f9400c901152779ae0ebfe74cf8f7aac1d3396 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62286/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added tests that verify that the new recovery process correctly performs and 
> produces meaningful result under various circumstances (recovered positions 
> were truncated, replica was lagging far behind). Ran `make check`.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ilya Pronin
> 
>

Reply via email to