-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62145/#review190983
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/slave/http.cpp
Line 2421 (original), 2453 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62145/#comment268570>

    `switch_user` is posix only flag. You need to wrap with `ifndef 
__WINDOWS__`?



src/slave/http.cpp
Line 2422 (original), 2454-2456 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62145/#comment268571>

    For nested container, we by default use executor's user? Can you add that 
logic back?


- Jie Yu


On Nov. 14, 2017, 1:32 a.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/62145/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 14, 2017, 1:32 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7305
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7305
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The Standalone and Nested Container APIs are very similar.
> This commit combines the two API implementations by adding a
> translation function (i.e. `launchNestedContainer` and 
> `launchContainer`) which unpacks the V1 protobuf into fields
> which can be passed into a common function (i.e. `_launchContainer`).
> 
> The common functions authorize based on the type of container being
> launched and it is possible to use both Standalone and Nested
> Container APIs interchangably for nested containers.
> 
> This approach is somewhat messy for for the `WAIT_(NESTED_)CONTAINER`
> calls, as these methods require different return protobufs based on
> the original call.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/http.hpp 44a95dec4c9b8bb65d712c5538bbd7afffe2cf7b 
>   src/slave/http.cpp 22cdac97e1a8a28ca149043ffa1d0646073d7fdb 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62145/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See later in chain.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joseph Wu
> 
>

Reply via email to