-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64267/#review192621
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/slave.cpp
Lines 621 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64267/#comment270886>

    What if `image_providers` is specified by the operator but Mesos 
containerizer is not enabled? Do we still want to enable auto image gc in this 
case?



src/slave/slave.cpp
Lines 6171-6173 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64267/#comment270887>

    This should be an `else if`, elsewise we will access `usage.get()` even it 
is not ready.


- Qian Zhang


On Dec. 2, 2017, 9:10 a.m., Gilbert Song wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64267/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 2, 2017, 9:10 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Qian Zhang, Vinod Kone, and Zhitao Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8294
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8294
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Supported basic auto image gc in the agent.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 643d8559244f0842e82b293c1ef99cb26e111059 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp a9aa987ade67542b85aeb51356d00a4c14c6be9d 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64267/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gilbert Song
> 
>

Reply via email to