> On Jan. 26, 2018, 5:31 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/memory_profiler.cpp
> > Lines 198-240 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/63368/diff/2/?file=1945991#file1945991line198>
> >
> >     Can we combine these two with in a `Result<T> 
> > updateJemallocSetting(const char* name, const T& value)`?

Sadly, no. As the comment above `writeJemallocSetting()` is trying to say, we 
don't have something to pass for the second and third argument of `mallctl()`, 
and jemalloc will return an error if we pass in some dummy value.


- Benno


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63368/#review196340
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 27, 2017, 7:04 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63368/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 27, 2017, 7:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This class exposes profiling functionality of jemalloc memory allocator
> when it is detected to be the memory allocator of the current process.
> 
> In particular, it gives developers an easy method to collect and
> access heap profiles which report which pieces of code were
> responsible for allocating memory.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/Makefile.am ba9e78148932304ce1961b88e5f97180abd35586 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/memory_profiler.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/process.hpp 
> 8b8323f5fb4617aa9c22bbdb56af3d1cb0b06ea3 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/memory_profiler.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 
> 2126c272a69bfa53b4b3cbbb1a55a3f81a5da8ad 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63368/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benno Evers
> 
>

Reply via email to