-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64618/#review199426
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/master.cpp
Lines 5934 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64618/#comment279747>

    whitespace line after multi-line log



src/master/master.cpp
Lines 5944 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64618/#comment279748>

    whitespace line after multi-line log



src/master/master.cpp
Lines 5966 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64618/#comment279749>

    whitespace line after multi-line log



src/master/master.cpp
Lines 5969 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64618/#comment279750>

    whitespace after block
    
    `const UUID& ...`



src/master/master.cpp
Lines 5972 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64618/#comment279751>

    How is this CHECK validated/ensured?



src/master/master.cpp
Lines 5989 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64618/#comment279752>

    whitespace line after multi-line log


- Zhitao Li


On March 16, 2018, 12:57 p.m., Gaston Kleiman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64618/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 16, 2018, 12:57 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Greg Mann and Zhitao Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8184
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8184
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Implemented the master's `ACKNOWLEDGE_OPERATION_STATUS` handler.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp cf03d8bf7df583c849a3b2a326d3772820181b0f 
>   src/master/master.hpp 8bf2c763dafdb7df55c46a56f2ff66f2a951d947 
>   src/master/master.cpp 223ebf29ac4dd1dea9080e4bef4b2d4d064d847f 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64618/diff/8/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check` on GNU/Linux
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gaston Kleiman
> 
>

Reply via email to