> On Sept. 19, 2018, 1:12 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > src/tests/agent_resource_provider_config_api_tests.cpp
> > Lines 508-511 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68758/diff/1/?file=2090232#file2090232line508>
> >
> >     We don't seem to explicitly need this here. Is this something we could 
> > change in the fixture instead?

Fixed in r/68777.


> On Sept. 19, 2018, 1:12 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > src/tests/agent_resource_provider_config_api_tests.cpp
> > Lines 826 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68758/diff/1/?file=2090232#file2090232line826>
> >
> >     Can and should we also check that existing RP is not terminated?

We can manipulate the clock similar to the `*Idempotent` tests, but I feel it a 
bit unnecessary here since that would make the test less concise and we already 
checked that the file doesn't change. If you still think we should do the check 
I can do that.


- Chun-Hung


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68758/#review208762
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 19, 2018, 4:50 a.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68758/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 19, 2018, 4:50 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Jie Yu, and Jan Schlicht.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9228
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9228
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added unit tests for adding/updating invalid resource provider configs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/agent_resource_provider_config_api_tests.cpp 
> e6a68bae1a9e3e773ea45deae4951664ab81a857 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68758/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chun-Hung Hsiao
> 
>

Reply via email to