> On Sept. 21, 2018, 10:50 a.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > src/resource_provider/daemon.cpp
> > Lines 431-433 (original), 483-485 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68763/diff/2/?file=2090658#file2090658line488>
> >
> >     How does this hold? It seems we should e.g., insert a `remove` call 
> > before continuing with `_launch`.
> 
> Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
>     I assume you're talking about an `erase`. No we cannot simply erase it, 
> because the `providers` struct is the source of truth whether we should 
> accept or reject an add, an update, or a remove when requesting the auth 
> token.

Oh now I get it. You're suggesting that we should explicitly call a `remove`? 
But in the case of `update`, we don't need to actually do the cleanup as we do 
in `remove`.


- Chun-Hung


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68763/#review208846
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 20, 2018, 11:21 p.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68763/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 20, 2018, 11:21 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Jie Yu, and Jan Schlicht.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9228
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9228
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When processing `REMOVE_RESOURCE_PROVIDER_CONFIG`, the local resource
> provider daemon now performs a best-effort cleanup by killing all
> standalone containers prefixed by the 'cid_prefix' of the resource
> provider. During the cleanup, no resource provider config with the same
> type and name can be added.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/resource_provider/daemon.cpp 0a76cc6d1d34413674d1af1aa514679a4d2b7b55 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68763/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chun-Hung Hsiao
> 
>

Reply via email to