> On Jan. 18, 2019, 4:22 a.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote: > > src/tests/storage_local_resource_provider_tests.cpp > > Lines 3340 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/69781/diff/1/?file=2120161#file2120161line3344> > > > > Could it be possible that the second `UpdateSlaveMessage` has been > > received before this `FUTURE_PROTOBUF` is set up?
Definitely, installing two expectations right away now instead. - Benjamin ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69781/#review212122 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 18, 2019, 12:45 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/69781/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 18, 2019, 12:45 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Chun-Hung Hsiao. > > > Bugs: MESOS-9130 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9130 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > While we addressed one source of flakiness of this test in > `2117f671c450d7c74edc53078e8c0ed6035020aa` we introduced a new source of > flakiness (agents send more than the expected number of > `UpdateSlaveMessage`s since they failed a timeout in registration with > the master). > > This patch ensures that the agent registers successfully before > continuing with the test. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/tests/storage_local_resource_provider_tests.cpp > 164e93a3749d4d668e12de31641aecddddece384 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69781/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > `make check` > > > Thanks, > > Benjamin Bannier > >
