Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3861#discussion_r24644661
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/CoarseGrainedMesosExecutorBackend.scala
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.spark.executor
    +
    +import org.apache.spark.{SparkConf, Logging, SecurityManager}
    +import org.apache.mesos.{Executor => MesosExecutor, ExecutorDriver, 
MesosExecutorDriver, MesosNativeLibrary}
    +import org.apache.spark.util.{Utils, SignalLogger}
    +import org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkHadoopUtil
    +import org.apache.mesos.Protos._
    +import org.apache.spark.deploy.worker.StandaloneWorkerShuffleService
    +import scala.collection.JavaConversions._
    +import scala.io.Source
    +import java.io.{File, PrintWriter}
    +
    +/**
    + * The Coarse grained Mesos executor backend is responsible for launching 
the shuffle service
    + * and the CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend actor.
    + * This is assuming the scheduler detected that the shuffle service is 
enabled and launches
    + * this class instead of CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend directly.
    + */
    +private[spark] class CoarseGrainedMesosExecutorBackend(val sparkConf: 
SparkConf)
    +  extends MesosExecutor
    +  with Logging {
    +
    +  private var shuffleService: StandaloneWorkerShuffleService = null
    +  private var driver: ExecutorDriver = null
    +  private var executorProc: Process = null
    +  private var taskId: TaskID = null
    +  @volatile var killed = false
    +
    +  override def registered(
    +      driver: ExecutorDriver,
    +      executorInfo: ExecutorInfo,
    +      frameworkInfo: FrameworkInfo,
    +      slaveInfo: SlaveInfo) {
    +    this.driver = driver
    +    logInfo("Coarse Grained Mesos Executor '" + 
executorInfo.getExecutorId.getValue +
    +      "' is registered.")
    +
    +    if (shuffleService == null) {
    +      sparkConf.set("spark.shuffle.service.enabled", "true")
    +      shuffleService = new StandaloneWorkerShuffleService(sparkConf, new 
SecurityManager(sparkConf))
    +      shuffleService.startIfEnabled()
    +    }
    +  }
    +
    +  override def launchTask(d: ExecutorDriver, taskInfo: TaskInfo) {
    +    if (executorProc != null) {
    +      logError("Received LaunchTask while executor is already running")
    +      val status = TaskStatus.newBuilder()
    +        .setTaskId(taskInfo.getTaskId)
    +        .setSlaveId(taskInfo.getSlaveId)
    +        .setState(TaskState.TASK_FAILED)
    +        .setMessage("Received LaunchTask while executor is already 
running")
    +        .build()
    +      d.sendStatusUpdate(status)
    +      return
    +    }
    +
    +    killed = false
    +
    +    logInfo("Launching task id: " + taskInfo.getTaskId.getValue)
    +
    +    // We are launching the CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend via subprocess
    +    // because the backend is designed to run in its own process.
    +    // Since it's a shared class we are preserving the existing behavior
    +    // and launching it as a subprocess here.
    +    val command = "exec " + 
Utils.deserialize[String](taskInfo.getData().toByteArray)
    --- End diff --
    
    here `command` is a giant string instead of a list of command line 
arguments. Should we do something like `Utils.splitCommandString` here to 
preserve the command properly when we pass it to the `ProcessBuilder`?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to