EnricoMi commented on PR #38312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38312#issuecomment-1288553317

   > One problem I can see is bad backward compatibility.
   
   Meaning once we make Spark 3.x return longs here, supporting nano Timestamps 
must be moved to Spark 4.x?
   
   But with a configuration flag like `spark.sql.parquet.timestampNTZ.enabled`, 
the user can control the break and Spark 3.x is free to support this in the 
future.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to