cloud-fan commented on code in PR #39509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39509#discussion_r1067633765


##########
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveGroupByAll.scala:
##########
@@ -93,8 +93,9 @@ object ResolveGroupByAll extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
    * end of analysis, so we can tell users that we fail to infer the grouping 
columns.
    */
   def checkAnalysis(operator: LogicalPlan): Unit = operator match {
-    case a: Aggregate if matchToken(a) =>
-      if (a.aggregateExpressions.exists(_.exists(_.isInstanceOf[Attribute]))) {
+    case a: Aggregate if a.aggregateExpressions.forall(_.resolved) && 
matchToken(a) =>

Review Comment:
   The check code here is a partial version of the `apply` code. I can't think 
of a simple refactor that can reduce more code duplication. Let's think about 
this later.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to