viirya commented on code in PR #40446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40446#discussion_r1138097640
##########
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/EquivalentExpressions.scala:
##########
@@ -128,10 +131,23 @@ class EquivalentExpressions {
// There are some special expressions that we should not recurse into all of
its children.
// 1. CodegenFallback: it's children will not be used to generate code
(call eval() instead)
// 2. ConditionalExpression: use its children that will always be
evaluated.
- private def childrenToRecurse(expr: Expression): Seq[Expression] = expr
match {
- case _: CodegenFallback => Nil
- case c: ConditionalExpression => c.alwaysEvaluatedInputs
- case other => other.children
+ private def childrenToRecurse(expr: Expression): Seq[Expression] = {
+ val alwaysEvaluated = expr match {
+ case _: CodegenFallback => Nil
+ case c: ConditionalExpression => c.alwaysEvaluatedInputs
+ case other => other.children
+ }
+ if (shortcut) {
+ // The subexpression may not need to eval even if it appears more than
once.
+ // e.g., `if(or(a, and(b, b)))`, the expression `b` would be skipped if
`a` is true.
+ alwaysEvaluated.map {
+ case and: And => and.left
+ case or: Or => or.left
+ case other => other
+ }
Review Comment:
Hmm, if other expression (e.g. `or.right`) is not added into recursing list,
how can we look into if it needs to be eliminated? If `or.left` is false, it
will be evaluated, isn't?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
