jchen5 commented on code in PR #40811:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40811#discussion_r1169400435


##########
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/subquery.scala:
##########
@@ -325,9 +327,20 @@ object PullupCorrelatedPredicates extends 
Rule[LogicalPlan] with PredicateHelper
     }
 
     plan.transformExpressionsWithPruning(_.containsPattern(PLAN_EXPRESSION)) {
-      case ScalarSubquery(sub, children, exprId, conditions, hint) if 
children.nonEmpty =>
+      case ScalarSubquery(sub, children, exprId, conditions, hint, 
mayHaveCountBugOld)
+        if children.nonEmpty =>
         val (newPlan, newCond) = decorrelate(sub, plan)
-        ScalarSubquery(newPlan, children, exprId, getJoinCondition(newCond, 
conditions), hint)
+        val mayHaveCountBug = if (mayHaveCountBugOld.isDefined) {
+          // For idempotency, we must save this variable the first time this 
rule is run. Afterward,
+          // the information about whether the subquery has a GROUP BY clause 
is lost because a
+          // GROUP BY is introduced if one wasn't already present.
+          mayHaveCountBugOld.get
+        } else {
+          val (topPart, havingNode, aggNode) = splitSubquery(sub)
+          (aggNode.isDefined && aggNode.get.groupingExpressions.isEmpty)

Review Comment:
   This is the first main part of the fix.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to