LuciferYang commented on code in PR #42092:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42092#discussion_r1324738993
##########
project/MimaExcludes.scala:
##########
@@ -174,6 +174,35 @@ object MimaExcludes {
ProblemFilters.exclude[MissingClassProblem]("org.apache.spark.sql.types.ObjectType"),
ProblemFilters.exclude[MissingClassProblem]("org.apache.spark.sql.types.ObjectType$"),
+ // SPARK-44496: Move Interfaces needed by SCSC to sql/api.
+
ProblemFilters.exclude[MissingClassProblem]("org.apache.spark.sql.Encoder"),
Review Comment:
@amaliujia Apologies for the late comment. Why were these `ProblemFilters`
placed in `defaultExcludes` instead of `v35excludes`? Will they never be
involved in the Mima check again?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
