aokolnychyi commented on code in PR #47190: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/47190#discussion_r1710496899
########## sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/connector/catalog/ProcedureCatalog.java: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +package org.apache.spark.sql.connector.catalog; + +import org.apache.spark.annotation.Evolving; +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.NoSuchProcedureException; +import org.apache.spark.sql.connector.catalog.procedures.UnboundProcedure; + +/** + * A catalog API for working with procedures. + * + * @since 4.1.0 + */ +@Evolving +public interface ProcedureCatalog extends CatalogPlugin { + /** + * Load a procedure by {@link Identifier identifier} from the catalog. + * + * @param ident a procedure identifier + * @return the loaded unbound procedure + * @throws NoSuchProcedureException if the procedure does not exist Review Comment: I followed what we did for tables, functions, and views where we added special exception types. In the implementation PR, I do catch these and wrap into `ROUTINE_NOT_FOUND` like we do for functions. ``` try { ... } catch { case _: NoSuchProcedureException => throw QueryCompilationErrors.noSuchRoutineError(name) } ``` While I do agree with you that we can skip this exception type, I worry about consistency of the connector API. What do you think? I am going back and forth here. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
