HyukjinKwon commented on code in PR #52153:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/52153#discussion_r2309310854


##########
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/physical/partitioning.scala:
##########
@@ -946,3 +946,24 @@ case class ShuffleSpecCollection(specs: Seq[ShuffleSpec]) 
extends ShuffleSpec {
     specs.head.numPartitions
   }
 }
+
+/**
+ * Represents a partitioning where partition IDs are passed through directly 
from the
+ * DirectShufflePartitionID expression. This partitioning scheme is used when 
users
+ * want to directly control partition placement rather than using hash-based 
partitioning.
+ *
+ * This partitioning maps directly to the PartitionIdPassthrough RDD 
partitioner.
+ */
+case class ShufflePartitionIdPassThrough(

Review Comment:
   Nope, it will not reuse or remove shuffles. This is more to replace RDD's 
Partitioner API so people can completely migrate to DataFrame API. For the fact 
of performance and efficiency, it won't be super useful.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to