Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6423#issuecomment-110151707
I really appreciate keeping the PR small in scope to make it easier to
review -- but I am also a little torn that I have a hard time seeing concretely
the advantage of this. I gather this has something to do with Parquet, but I
don't see the connection. Can you perhaps at least link the existing jira to
the larger change to put it in context? Not that I see anything wrong w/ these
changes per se, but they are also not useful by themselves.
(sorry I hate myself for saying this ... I have been on the other end of
this argument and I know its hard to balance having narrowly scoped PRs for
easy review and also making the utility clear.)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
