Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#discussion_r33393505
--- Diff: docs/monitoring.md ---
@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ follows:
<tr>
<td>spark.history.provider</td>
<td>org.apache.spark.deploy.history.FsHistoryProvider</td>
- <td>Name of the class implementing the application history backend.
Currently there is only
- one implementation, provided by Spark, which looks for application
logs stored in the
+ <td>Name of the class implementing the application history backend.
The default implementation,
+ the FsHistoryProvider, which looks for application logs stored in the
--- End diff --
Grammar sounds weird; perhaps "The default implementation is
FsHistoryProvider, which..."?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
