Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48386195
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
 ---
    @@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin extends 
Rule[LogicalPlan] with PredicateHelper {
     }
     
     /**
    +  * Push [[Limit]] operators through [[Join]] operators, iff the join type 
is outer joins.
    +  * Adding extra [[Limit]] operators on top of the outer-side 
child/children.
    +  */
    +object PushLimitThroughOuterJoin extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with 
PredicateHelper {
    --- End diff --
    
    I feel we will generate wrong results. It is not safe to push down the 
limit if we are not joining on the foreign key with the primary key, right? For 
example, for a left outer join, we push down the limit to the right table. It 
is possible all rows returned by the right side are having the same join column 
value.
    
    am I missing anything?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to