Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#discussion_r49253296
  
    --- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py ---
    @@ -38,13 +38,120 @@
     from pyspark.mllib.util import Saveable, Loader, inherit_doc, JavaLoader, 
JavaSaveable
     from pyspark.streaming import DStream
     
    -__all__ = ['KMeansModel', 'KMeans', 'GaussianMixtureModel', 
'GaussianMixture',
    -           'PowerIterationClusteringModel', 'PowerIterationClustering',
    -           'StreamingKMeans', 'StreamingKMeansModel',
    +__all__ = ['BisectingKMeansModel', 'BisectingKMeans', 'KMeansModel', 
'KMeans',
    +           'GaussianMixtureModel', 'GaussianMixture', 
'PowerIterationClusteringModel',
    +           'PowerIterationClustering', 'StreamingKMeans', 
'StreamingKMeansModel',
                'LDA', 'LDAModel']
     
     
     @inherit_doc
    +class BisectingKMeansModel(JavaModelWrapper):
    +    """
    +    .. note:: Experimental
    +
    +    A clustering model derived from the bisecting k-means method.
    +
    +    >>> data = array([0.0,0.0, 1.0,1.0, 9.0,8.0, 8.0,9.0]).reshape(4, 2)
    +    >>> bskm = BisectingKMeans()
    +    >>> model = bskm.train(sc.parallelize(data), k=4)
    +    >>> p = array([0.0, 0.0])
    +    >>> model.predict(p) == model.predict(p)
    +    True
    +    >>> model.predict(sc.parallelize([p])).first() == model.predict(p)
    +    True
    +    >>> model.k
    +    4
    +    >>> model.computeCost(array([0.0, 0.0]))
    +    0.0
    +    >>> model.k == len(model.clusterCenters)
    +    True
    +    >>> model = bskm.train(sc.parallelize(data), k=2)
    +    >>> model.predict(array([0.0, 0.0])) == model.predict(array([1.0, 
1.0]))
    +    True
    +    >>> model.k
    +    2
    +
    +    .. versionadded:: 2.0.0
    +    """
    +
    +    @property
    +    @since('2.0.0')
    +    def clusterCenters(self):
    +        """Get the cluster centers, represented as a list of NumPy 
arrays."""
    +        return [c.toArray() for c in self.call("clusterCenters")]
    +
    +    @property
    +    @since('2.0.0')
    +    def k(self):
    +        """Get the number of clusters"""
    +        return self.call("k")
    +
    +    @since('2.0.0')
    +    def predict(self, x):
    +        """
    +        Find the cluster to which x belongs in this model.
    +
    +        :param x: Either the point to determine the cluster for or an RDD 
of points to determine
    +        the clusters for.
    +        """
    +        if isinstance(x, RDD):
    +            vecs = x.map(_convert_to_vector)
    +            return self.call("predict", vecs)
    +
    +        x = _convert_to_vector(x)
    +        return self.call("predict", x)
    +
    +    @since('2.0.0')
    +    def computeCost(self, point):
    +        """
    +        Return the Bisecting K-means cost (sum of squared distances of 
points to
    +        their nearest center) for this model on the given data.
    +
    +        :param point: the point to compute the cost to
    +        """
    +        return self.call("computeCost", _convert_to_vector(point))
    +
    +
    +class BisectingKMeans:
    +    """
    +    .. note:: Experimental
    +
    +    A bisecting k-means algorithm based on the paper "A comparison of 
document clustering
    --- End diff --
    
    Are we sure on the 74? Looking at pep8/pep257 it says 72 (although we 
extended the length for code lines so maybe we changed that too)? We could try 
and add a lint rule for this maybe in the future.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to