Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12404#issuecomment-210647651
Fair enough. We can revisit if more estimators use the param, or if we add
minTF to HashingTF.
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 at 22:54, jkbradley <[email protected]> wrote:
> I prefer to keep them separate. There isn't much benefit to combining 2
> instances, and the doc becomes a bit less clear.
>
> â
> You are receiving this because you commented.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12404#issuecomment-210642641>
>
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
