Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12060#discussion_r60838822
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -403,32 +403,47 @@ class DAGScheduler(
parents.toList
}
- /** Find ancestor shuffle dependencies that are not registered in
shuffleToMapStage yet */
- private def getAncestorShuffleDependencies(rdd: RDD[_]):
Stack[ShuffleDependency[_, _, _]] = {
- val parents = new Stack[ShuffleDependency[_, _, _]]
+ /**
+ * Find ancestor shuffle dependencies that are not registered in
shuffleToMapStage yet.
+ * This is done in topological order to create ancestor stages first to
ensure that the result
+ * stage graph is correctly built.
+ */
+ private def getAncestorShuffleDependencies(rdd: RDD[_]):
Seq[ShuffleDependency[_, _, _]] = {
+ val parents = new ArrayBuffer[ShuffleDependency[_, _, _]]
val visited = new HashSet[RDD[_]]
// We are manually maintaining a stack here to prevent
StackOverflowError
// caused by recursively visiting
val waitingForVisit = new Stack[RDD[_]]
def visit(r: RDD[_]) {
- if (!visited(r)) {
- visited += r
- for (dep <- r.dependencies) {
- dep match {
- case shufDep: ShuffleDependency[_, _, _] =>
- if (!shuffleToMapStage.contains(shufDep.shuffleId)) {
- parents.push(shufDep)
- }
- case _ =>
+ if (visited(r)) {
--- End diff --
Is the code change here fixing a correctness issue? Is this related to the
performance issue described in the pull request?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
