Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r74805503
  
    --- Diff: 
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
 ---
    @@ -945,13 +955,139 @@ class BinaryLogisticRegressionSummary 
private[classification] (
     private class LogisticAggregator(
         private val numFeatures: Int,
         numClasses: Int,
    -    fitIntercept: Boolean) extends Serializable {
    +    fitIntercept: Boolean,
    +    multinomial: Boolean,
    +    standardize: Boolean) extends Serializable {
     
       private var weightSum = 0.0
       private var lossSum = 0.0
     
    -  private val gradientSumArray =
    -    Array.ofDim[Double](if (fitIntercept) numFeatures + 1 else numFeatures)
    +  private val totalCoefficientLength = {
    +    val cols = if (fitIntercept) numFeatures + 1 else numFeatures
    +    val rows = if (multinomial) numClasses else 1
    +    rows * cols
    +  }
    +
    +  private val gradientSumArray = 
Array.ofDim[Double](totalCoefficientLength)
    +
    +  /** Update gradient and loss using binary loss function. */
    +  private def binaryUpdateInPlace(
    +      features: Vector,
    +      weight: Double,
    +      label: Double,
    +      coefficients: Array[Double],
    +      gradient: Array[Double],
    +      featuresStd: Array[Double],
    +      numFeaturesPlusIntercept: Int,
    +      standardize: Boolean): Unit = {
    +    val margin = - {
    +      var sum = 0.0
    +      features.foreachActive { (index, value) =>
    +        if (featuresStd(index) != 0.0 && value != 0.0) {
    +          val x = if (standardize) value / featuresStd(index) else value
    --- End diff --
    
    That's a good point, the current code is confusing. The issue is that 
**standardizing the features in every iteration is not efficient.**
    
    In the old `mllib` implementation, the feature standardization was 
implemented by transforming the entire dataset once, _before_ optimization, and 
operating on that dataset. The results were "unstandardized" at the end to make 
this transformation transparent. In the `ml` implementation of BLOR, the 
standardization is performed by dividing each `x_ij` by its column standard 
deviation. In every iteration, that is `numFeatures * numClasses * numPoints` 
extra scalar divisions. I am not sure why it was done differently in `ml` so I 
might be missing an important design discussion somewhere. Since binary log reg 
will still take the "standardize every iteration" approach, but MLOR and BLOR 
will still call the same shared aggregator, I tried to make this generic. It's 
true we can hardcode MLOR not to do it every iteration (so there would be no 
`standardize` field). But then taking two separate approaches within the same 
aggregator without making it explicitly clear seems confusing and uni
 ntuitive to me. My thoughts were that we could just remove this if we decide 
to change the approach in BLOR (in a later PR) to match the one proposed here, 
but to leave it generic until then. I appreciate thoughts on this.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to