Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2019#discussion_r16632233
  
    --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/Connection.scala ---
    @@ -263,14 +282,20 @@ class SendingConnection(val address: 
InetSocketAddress, selector_ : Selector,
     
       val DEFAULT_INTEREST = SelectionKey.OP_READ
     
    +  var alreadyReading = false
    +
       override def registerInterest() {
         // Registering read too - does not really help in most cases, but for 
some
         // it does - so let us keep it for now.
    -    changeConnectionKeyInterest(SelectionKey.OP_WRITE | DEFAULT_INTEREST)
    +    changeConnectionKeyInterest(
    +      SelectionKey.OP_WRITE | (if (!alreadyReading) {
    +        alreadyReading = true
    +        DEFAULT_INTEREST
    +      } else { 0 }))
    --- End diff --
    
    Yes, we use blocking IO.
    And I had a misunderstanding. SocketChannel#read blocks the other thread 
which try to call SocketChannel#read on the same instance so unregistering 
OP_READ is wrong.
    So, we should resolve race condition using another way because a thread 
registering OP_READ can call SocketChannel#close in SendingConnection#read 
during a thread registering OP_WRITE calls SocketChannel#write in 
SendingConnection#write.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to