Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770#discussion_r115115766
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1027,7 +1030,7 @@ class Analyzer(
* The HAVING clause could also used a grouping columns that is not
presented in the SELECT.
*/
object ResolveMissingReferences extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
--- End diff --
The `Filter` case of this `ResolveMissingReferences` rule doesn't look
making much sense to me. I've opened #17874 for it. Here I'd make necessary
change to pass tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
