Github user yucai commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788#discussion_r169901683
  
    --- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
    @@ -1129,6 +1129,12 @@ object MimaExcludes {
           
ProblemFilters.exclude[InheritedNewAbstractMethodProblem]("org.apache.spark.ml.param.shared.HasLoss.org$apache$spark$ml$param$shared$HasLoss$_setter_$loss_="),
           
ProblemFilters.exclude[InheritedNewAbstractMethodProblem]("org.apache.spark.ml.param.shared.HasLoss.getLoss"),
           
ProblemFilters.exclude[InheritedNewAbstractMethodProblem]("org.apache.spark.ml.param.shared.HasLoss.loss")
    +    ) ++ Seq(
    +      // [SPARK-9853][Core] Optimize shuffle fetch of contiguous partition 
IDs.
    +      
ProblemFilters.exclude[MissingTypesProblem]("org.apache.spark.FetchFailed$"),
    --- End diff --
    
    I see, so I will keep FetchFailed as it was (no numBlocks is introduced), 
is it OK?


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to