Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21721#discussion_r206241038 --- Diff: sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/writer/streaming/SupportsCustomWriterMetrics.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ +package org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.writer.streaming; + +import org.apache.spark.annotation.InterfaceStability; +import org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.CustomMetrics; +import org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.writer.DataSourceWriter; + +/** + * A mix in interface for {@link DataSourceWriter}. Data source writers can implement this --- End diff -- The intention was to restrict the mixin so that it can be applied only to `DataSourceReader` and `DataSourceWriter` (similar pattern followed in other mixins) by inheriting the appropriate types. Unfortunately theres no common ancestor for the mixin to inherit from so I had to duplicate the interface. Agree that its not ideal. A few options: 1. Have a common ancestor marker interface (say `DataSourceComponent`) which is the super type of `DataSourceReader` and `DataSourceWriter`. Then we can have a single mixin that is a subtype of that interface. We may encounter similar usages for other mixins in future. 2. The mixin does not inherit anything (neither DataSourceReader nor DataSourceWriter). Here we cannot impose a restriction on the type of classes the mixin can be applied to. 3. Duplicate interfaces (the proposed option in the patch). I prefer option 1, but would like to proceed based on the feedback.
--- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org