Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22233#discussion_r213371098
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -671,7 +674,7 @@ case class AlterTableRecoverPartitionsCommand(
val value = ExternalCatalogUtils.unescapePathName(ps(1))
if (resolver(columnName, partitionNames.head)) {
scanPartitions(spark, fs, filter, st.getPath, spec ++
Map(partitionNames.head -> value),
- partitionNames.drop(1), threshold, resolver)
+ partitionNames.drop(1), threshold, resolver,
listFilesInParallel = false)
--- End diff --
Got it. sorry for my overlooking.
Are other places safe where parallelism would not reach the fixed thread
pool size?
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
