squito commented on a change in pull request #23337: [SPARK-26019][PYSPARK] 
Allow insecure py4j gateways
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23337#discussion_r242717023
 
 

 ##########
 File path: python/pyspark/context.py
 ##########
 @@ -112,6 +112,18 @@ def __init__(self, master=None, appName=None, 
sparkHome=None, pyFiles=None,
         ValueError:...
         """
         self._callsite = first_spark_call() or CallSite(None, None, None)
+        if gateway is not None and gateway.gateway_parameters.auth_token is 
None:
+            if conf and conf.get("spark.python.allowInsecurePy4j", "false") == 
"true":
 
 Review comment:
   ugh, yeah I didn't think this through.  @HyukjinKwon I think you might know 
the zeppellin use case best -- any opinion what would be easier for the end 
user to change, without having to modify the code of zeppelin itself?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to