squito commented on a change in pull request #22806: [SPARK-25250][CORE] : Late 
zombie task completions handled correctly even before new taskset launched
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22806#discussion_r252419806
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala
 ##########
 @@ -2849,6 +2862,53 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite with 
LocalSparkContext with TimeLi
     }
   }
 
+  // This test is kind of similar and goes alongwith "Completions in zombie 
tasksets update
+  // status of non-zombie taskset" in TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala.
+  test("SPARK-25250: Late zombie task completions handled correctly even 
before" +
+    " new taskset launched") {
+    val shuffleMapRdd = new MyRDD(sc, 4, Nil)
+    val shuffleDep = new ShuffleDependency(shuffleMapRdd, new 
HashPartitioner(4))
+    val reduceRdd = new MyRDD(sc, 4, List(shuffleDep), tracker = 
mapOutputTracker)
+    submit(reduceRdd, Array(0, 1, 2, 3))
+
+    completeShuffleMapStageSuccessfully(0, 0, numShufflePartitions = 4)
+
+    // Fail Stage 1 Attempt 0 with Fetch Failure
+    runEvent(makeCompletionEvent(
+      taskSets(1).tasks(0),
+      FetchFailed(makeBlockManagerId("hostA"), shuffleDep.shuffleId, 0, 0, 
"ignored"),
+      null))
+
+    // this will trigger a resubmission of stage 0, since we've lost some of 
its
+    // map output, for the next iteration through the loop
+    scheduler.resubmitFailedStages()
+    completeShuffleMapStageSuccessfully(0, 1, numShufflePartitions = 4)
+
+    // tasksets 1 & 3 should be two different attempts for our reduce stage -- 
lets
+    // double-check test setup
+    val reduceStage = taskSets(1).stageId
+    assert(taskSets(3).stageId === reduceStage)
+
+    // complete one task from the original taskset, make sure we update the 
taskSchedulerImpl
+    // so it can notify all taskSetManagers. Some of that is mocked here, just 
check there
+    // is the right event.
+    val taskToComplete = taskSets(1).tasks(3)
+
+    runEvent(makeCompletionEvent(taskToComplete, Success, Nil, Nil))
+    assert(completedPartitions.getOrElse(reduceStage, Set()) === 
Set(taskToComplete.partitionId))
+
+    assert(completedPartitions.get(taskSets(3).stageId).get.contains(
+      taskSets(3).tasks(1).partitionId) == false, "Corresponding partition id 
for" +
+      " stage 1 attempt 1 is not complete yet")
+
+    // this will mark partition id 1 of stage 1 attempt 0 as complete. So we 
expect the status
+    // of that partition id to be reflected for stage 1 attempt 1 as well.
+    runEvent(makeCompletionEvent(
+      taskSets(1).tasks(1), Success, Nil, Nil))
+    assert(completedPartitions.get(taskSets(3).stageId).get.contains(
+      taskSets(3).tasks(1).partitionId) == true)
 
 Review comment:
   you added the check against the set below, but you can also remove the check 
for containing a specific element above, as that's implied with the full Set 
equality.  Same goes for all the checks for individual elements of the set in 
this test.
   
   also fyi, instead of `assert(foo.contains(...) == true)` just do 
`assert(foo.contains(...))`  (and `assert(!foo.contains` instead of `== false`)

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to